Difference between Hire Purchase vs. Term Loan

Hire purchase is a type of contract of purchase in which the seller/financier rents the asset for an agreed period of time in return for a set of monthly installments. The buyer obtains ownership only when the full amount of the contract has been paid to the financier/seller of goods. So, the buyer doesn’t own the asset until the last installment. Let us see in detail hire purchase vs term loan.

A term loan is financial assistance banks, and special institutions provide for lending money. If the buyer needs the ownership of the asset as and when he purchases, he can opt for “Term Loan Financing.” After assessing his net worth and financial position, the banks or special institutions provide the required amount to the borrower, restricted to his financial credentials.

In return, the provider asks for interest at a certain rate upon the principal, which the borrower has to pay together with the principal amount in installments. For purchasing an asset or any expansion, the term loan is an easy option to arrange finance in a short span of time.

Hire Purchase vs Term Loan

In Easier Terms: Should I Hire or Should I buy?


In hire purchase, the seller/financier owns the asset until the buyer makes the final payment; hence the word “Hire” is used. Whereas in the term loan, the buyer borrows money, pays for the asset, and owns it immediately. So, in the case of hire purchase, one cannot sell the asset if he runs into problems making periodic payments, but in the term loan, it can be sold.

Also Read: Hire Purchase

Cost of the Asset

The cost of the asset in the case of the term loan is the cost at which the buyer purchases + installation cost, if any, whereas, in the case of hire purchase, the cost to the buyer is normal cash price + HP Interest. The interest cost is also incurred in the case of term loans, but that forms part of the company’s finance cost and is not capitalized with the asset.

Repossession of the Hired Asset

It may happen that the buyer is unable to pay all the payments required under the agreement. Once the buyer stops making the installments, the seller/financier has the right to take away the asset. This is called Repossession. In a term loan, the borrower can only take away the assets provided as security against the loan. Normally, the purchased asset is the primary security of the term loan, along with the collateral security. So, the bank or financial institution can take away the underlying asset and the collateral.

Mortgage of Assets in the Form of Security

No security, in any form, is required for taking an asset on hire. At the same time, the borrowers need to pledge their assets as security in case of a term loan.

Financial Statements

hire purchase vs. term loan

In hire purchase, the asset’s value is not included in the financial statements since the owner is the financier company until the buyer pays the last hire charges installment. Whereas in the case of a loan, the value of an asset appears on the asset side, and a corresponding liability for loans against such asset appears on the liability side.

Effect of Taxation

In both cases, i.e., when the asset is purchased by loan, or if it is taken on hire, the user of the asset can take a deduction on the depreciation of the asset (which decreases every year due to the written down value effect) and also for interest on term loan or hire purchase installments—the only difference being in the quantitative amount of interest.

Cash Flow

Since there is no purchase of an asset in hire purchase, the cash flow is limited to the hire purchase installments. Whereas in the case of the term loan, the cash flow includes down-payment, loan received, purchase of asset, and installment paid at the required time.

The risk of Holding the Asset: In the case of hire purchase, there is an option called “The Half-Rule” which states that the user can return the asset and terminate the agreement at any time, giving the seller/ financier a notice in writing. Whereas in the case of loan financing, the asset user has to bear all the risk of asset devaluation due to changes in technology.


One can use the lump sum borrowed to pay for the asset and take immediate possession with a term loan. In contrast, if one takes assets on hire, a deposit is paid to take possession, and fixed installments repay the remaining purchase price over a fixed period. Legal ownership is obtained only after payment of the final installment.

Sanjay Borad

Sanjay Bulaki Borad

MBA-Finance, CMA, CS, Insolvency Professional, B'Com

Sanjay Borad, Founder of eFinanceManagement, is a Management Consultant with 7 years of MNC experience and 11 years in Consultancy. He caters to clients with turnovers from 200 Million to 12,000 Million, including listed entities, and has vast industry experience in over 20 sectors. Additionally, he serves as a visiting faculty for Finance and Costing in MBA Colleges and CA, CMA Coaching Classes.

1 thought on “Difference between Hire Purchase vs. Term Loan”

  1. Dear Sir,
    In the Hire Purchase, the Asset does not appear in the Balance Sheet of the Hirer, in that case how can he take advantage of Depreciation in the Income Tax.
    Kindly clarify.


Leave a Comment