Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Meaning, Accounting, Methods And More

Most businesses sell their goods and services on credit. However, not all customers end up paying the money they owe to a company. Though companies take measures to recover the money, some money may still remain uncollectible. In accounting terms, this uncollectible part is the bad debt. And one way to account for such uncollectible accounts is Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts is a reduction in the total amount of accounts receivable given in the company’s balance sheet. Such an allowance is actually an estimate from the management of the accounts receivables that it doesn’t expect to receive. In case there is a difference between the actual and the management expectations, the company adjusts its estimation methodology to align the estimates with the actual results.

When a company records the allowance for doubtful accounts, it simultaneously records a sale. In simpler terms, the company matches its estimate for the bad debt expense against the sale in the same period. This helps in developing an accurate understanding of the profitability of a sale.

Accounting for Allowance for Doubtful Account

A company using an accrual method of accounting will record the allowance for the doubtful debts. This helps ascertain the future bad debts and thus, enhances the accuracy of the company’s financial statements. Usually, companies mention these deductions right below the accounts receivables line item. Such an item qualifies as a contra asset account in the balance sheet.

Also Read: Bad Debts

The first journal entry would be to debit bad debt and credit the allowance for doubtful accounts. After the company decides that a certain amount is completely uncollectible, then it debits the allowance for doubtful accounts and credits the accounts receivable.

However, if a customer pays some amount back later, then the company will first have to reinstate the account that it initially wrote off. The journal entry for this will be accounts receivable debit and allowance for doubtful accounts credit. Then the company would pass the entry for the cash – debit cash and credit accounts receivable.

The only impact of this item on the income statement is that the initial charge to bad debt expense is shown when a company initially funds allowance. After that, any write-offs of accounts receivables against the allowance for doubtful accounts impacts the balance sheet.


A company has a debit balance of $120,000 in the Accounts Receivables for selling goods on credit. First, the company deploys the aging method to identify that $20,000 of the receivable has crossed the 100-days due date. Further, they scrutinize and identify that roughly $10,000 of these receivables would never be recovered. Therefore, the allowance for doubtful accounts should have a credit balance of $10,000. In case the current balance is $0, the journal entry would show the debit of $10,000 to bad debts expense and a credit of $10,000 to allowance for the doubtful accounts.

The balance sheet will now report Accounts Receivable of $120,000 less the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts of $10,000, for a net amount of $110,500. The income statement for the accounting period will report bad debts expense of $10,000.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Estimation Techniques for Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

There are several ways to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts, which are:

Historical Percentage

The management uses a historical percentage for assessing the bad accounts in the future. For instance, if a certain percentage of accounts receivable has gone bad in the past, the company would also take the same percentage for the future assessment. For example, on the basis of past data, a company founds that, on average, 3% of the total sales go bad each year. Then, if the sale is $100,000, then the allowance would be $3000.

Pareto Analysis

Companies that adopt this option will check the largest accounts receivables that total up to 80% of the receivable balance. This helps them to zero in on the customers who are more important than the rest. After that, the company uses the historical percentage method for smaller accounts. Generally, companies that have a few big accounts go for this method.

Aging Method

Under this, the company groups all its accounts receivable by age, i.e., as per their due date.  Then the company applies a specific percentage to each group. The aggregate of all is the estimated uncollectible amount. For example, a company has $7000 sales that are less than 100-days old and $3000 as more than 100-days old. On the basis of past data, the company knows that 1% of less than 100-days and 3% more than 100-days old sales get uncollectible on an average.

In this case, the allowance for doubtful accounts would be (($7000*1%) + ($3000*3%)) $1600.

Risk Classification

Customers are assigned a risk score, and the ones with the higher score are supposed to be one at more risk of default.

Direct Write off Method Vs. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Some companies prefer the direct write-off method than making an allowance for doubtful accounts for accounting for bad debts. Under this method, the companies decide that they do not have any option of recovering the amount. This usually happens when none of the recovery attempts work.

Writing off the debt means the companies debiting the bad debt expenses and crediting the accounts receivables account. The IRS guidelines prefer the write-off method, but it does not conform to the GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles).

Generally, companies prefer this method for small accounts that do not impact financial records significantly. Also, this method is simple and helps with the tax as well. One drawback of this method is that the balance sheet does not give an exact representation of the company’s accounts receivable. Moreover, it can also encourage expense manipulation as a company records expenses and revenue in different periods.

On the other hand, allowance for doubtful debt gives an accurate matching of the financial records as it adheres to the matching principle. Unlike the direct write-off method, the balance sheet here provides an accurate record of the expenses. Under this, the companies don’t immediately write off the accounts. Instead, it first estimates the bad debt amount.

One possible drawback of this method is that management might make a wrong estimation of the allowance. This could misstate the net income. To overcome this, management must review the allowance for doubtful accounts monthly to ensure that it is not over or understated.

Sanjay Borad

Sanjay Bulaki Borad

MBA-Finance, CMA, CS, Insolvency Professional, B'Com

Sanjay Borad, Founder of eFinanceManagement, is a Management Consultant with 7 years of MNC experience and 11 years in Consultancy. He caters to clients with turnovers from 200 Million to 12,000 Million, including listed entities, and has vast industry experience in over 20 sectors. Additionally, he serves as a visiting faculty for Finance and Costing in MBA Colleges and CA, CMA Coaching Classes.

Leave a Comment