Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) is an alternate version of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). This theory, like CAPM, provides investors with an estimated required rate of return on risky securities. APT considers risk premium basis specified set of factors in addition to the correlation of the price of the asset with expected excess return on the market portfolio.

As per assumptions under Arbitrage Pricing Theory, return on an asset is dependent on various macroeconomic factors like inflation, exchange rates, market indices, production measures, market sentiments, changes in interest rates, movement of yield curves etc.

The Arbitrage pricing theory based model aims to do away with the limitations of the one-factor model (CAPM) that different stocks will have different sensitivities to different market factors which may be totally different from any other stock under observation. In layman terms, one can say that not all stocks can be assumed to react to single and same parameter always and hence the need to take multifactor and their sensitivities.

**Calculating the Expected Rate of Return of an Asset Using Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)**** **

**Arbitrage Pricing Theory Formula – **E(x) = rf + b1 * (factor 1) +b2 *(factor 2) + ….+ bn *(factor n)

Where,

**E(X) = **Expected rate of return on the risky asset

**Rf = **Risk-free interest rate or the interest rate that is expected from a risk-free asset

(Most commonly used in U.S. Treasury bills for the U.S.)

**B =** Sensitivity of the stock with respect to the factor; also referred to as beta factor 1, 2 …

**N =** Risk premium associated with respective factor

As the formula shows, the expected return on the asset/stock is a form of linear regression taking into consideration many factors that can affect the price of the asset and the degree to which it can affect it i.e. the asset’s sensitivity to those factors.

If one is able to identify a single factor which singly affects the price, the CAPM model shall be sufficient. If there is more than one factor affecting the price of the asset/stock, one will have to work with a two-factor model or a multi-factor model depending on the number of factors that affect the stock price movement for the company.

To understand APT, it is important for us to learn the underlying assumptions of this theory as given below.

Table of Contents

**Arbitrage Pricing Theory Assumptions**

- The theory is based on the principle of capital market efficiency and hence assumes all market participants trade with the intention of profit maximization
- It assumes no arbitrage exists and if it occurs participants will engage to benefit out of it and bring back the market to equilibrium levels.
- It assumes markets are frictionless, i.e. there are no transaction costs, no taxes, short selling is possible and an infinite number of securities is available.

Let us now look at some arbitrage pricing theory advantages and disadvantages summarized as under:

**Arbitrage Pricing Theory Benefits**

- APT model is a multi-factor model. So, the expected return is calculated taking into account various factors and their sensitivities that might affect the stock price movement. Thus, it allows the selection of factors that affect the stock price largely and specifically.
- APT model is based on arbitrage-free pricing or market equilibrium assumptions which to a certain extent result in a fair expectation of the rate of return on the risky asset.
- The apt-based multi-factor model places emphasis on the covariance between asset returns and exogenous factors, unlike CAPM. CAPM places emphasis on the covariance between asset returns and endogenous factors.
- The APT model works better in multi-period cases as against CAPM which is suitable for single period cases only.
- APT can be applied to the cost of capital and capital budgeting decisions.
- The APT model does not require any assumption about the empirical distribution of the asset returns, unlike CAPM which assumes that stock returns follow a normal distribution and thus APT a less restrictive model.

**Arbitrage Pricing Theory Limitations**

- The model requires a short listing of factors that impact the stock under consideration. Finding and listing all factors can be a difficult task and runs a risk of some or the other factor being ignored. Also, the risk of accidental correlations may exist which may cause a factor to become substantial impact provider or vice versa.
- The expected returns for each of these factors will have to be arrived at, which depending on the nature of the factor, may or may not be easily available always.
- The model requires calculating sensitivities of each factor which again can be an arduous task and may not be practically feasible.
- The factors that affect the stock price for a particular stock may change over a period of time. Moreover, the sensitivities associated may also undergo shifts which need to be continuously monitored making it very difficult to calculate and maintain.

**Conclusion**

Arbitrage Pricing Theory-based models are built on the principle of capital market efficiency and aim to provide decision-makers and participants with estimates of the required rate of return on the risky assets. The required rate of return arrived using the APT model can be used to evaluate, if the stocks are over-priced or under-priced. Empirical tests conducted in the past have resulted from APT as a superior model over CAPM in many cases. However, in several cases, it has arrived at similar results as the CAPM model, which is relatively simpler in use.^{1}

*Academia Education*. October 2018. [Source]

*** Disclaimer: This post may contain Affiliate Links marked as ** and we may earn a commission on sale. *

Good morning sir, please I want to know if arbitrage pricing policy is the same with arbitrage pricing Theory. I need more insight please.

Hi Joseph,

Thanks for writing in.

I believe there is only one ‘arbitrage pricing theory’ known in financial management which is explained in the article above. If there is some other arbitrage pricing policy in any other discipline like in economics or so, we are not aware of the same.