Vertical Analysis is one of the financial analysis methods, with the other two being Horizontal Analysis and Ratio Analysis. Under vertical analysis (or common-size analysis), one lists each line item in the financial statement as a percentage of the base figure. For instance, showing selling expenses as the percentage of gross sales.
The formula for calculations under this method is (Analysis Amount/Base Amount)*100
For example, if the base amount is gross sales of $50,000, and the analysis amount is selling expenses of $5000. Then the percentage will be 10% ($5,000/$50,000).
It is one of the popular financial analysis methods as it is simple to implement and easy to understand. Also, the method makes it easier to compare the performance (even line by line) of one company against another and also across industries.
Moreover, it also helps compare the numbers of a company between different time periods (trend analysis), be it quarterly, half-yearly, or annually. For instance, by expressing several expenses in the income statement as a percentage of sales, one can analyze if the profitability is improving. Thus, it also helps in keeping a check on the expenses.
For example, if the selling expenses over the past years have been in the range of 40-45% of gross sales. For the current year, they suddenly jump to say 50%; this is something that management should check.
Such a technique also helps identify where the company has put the resources. And, in what proportions have those resources been distributed among the balance sheet and income statement accounts. Moreover, the analysis also helps determine the relative weight of each account and its share in revenue generation.
Such an analysis also helps understand the percentage/share of the individual items and the structural composition of components, such as assets, liabilities, cost, and expenses. Additionally, it not only helps in spotting spikes but also in determining expenses that are small enough for management not to focus on them.
How it’s Different from Horizontal Analysis?
This method looks at the financial performance over a horizon of many years. Under Horizontal Analysis (also trend analysis), one shows the amounts of past financial statements as a percentage of the amount from the base year. For instance, year one is taken as the base over five years, and the amount of all other years is expressed as a percentage of the base year.
|Selling Expenses ($)||5000||5800||6000||6600||7100|
|Selling Expenses (%)||0%||116%||120%||132%||142%|
In the above example, the year 2000 is taken as the base year. Horizontal Analysis helps to identify the trend more easily. The example above clearly shows that the selling expenses of a firm have grown each year.
Read more on Methods of Financial Analysis
Vertical Analysis of Income Statement
Commonly, the vertical analysis in an income statement expresses line items as a percentage of sales. However, one can also use it to show the percentage of different revenue items that make up total sales. Following is an example of vertical analysis for an income statement:
|Cost of Goods Sold||400,000||40%|
|Salary and Wages||250,000||25%|
Vertical Analysis of Balance Sheet
In the vertical analysis of a balance sheet, a major question is what to use as a denominator. Usually, it is the total asset, but one also can use total liabilities for calculating the percentage of all liability line items. We can use a total of all equity accounts for the equity line item. Such an analysis helps evaluate the changes in the working capital and fixed assets over time. Investigating these changes could help an analyst know if the company is shifting to a different business model.
Following is an example of vertical analysis for a balance sheet where each line item is a percentage of total assets:
|Total Current Assets||600,000||60%|
- It does not help take a firm decision owing to a lack of standard percentage or ratio regarding the components in the balance sheet and income statement.
- Such an analysis does not vigilantly follow accounting concepts and conventions.
- It does not help in measuring liquidity.
- Owing to the lack of consistency in the ratio of the elements, it does not provide a quality analysis of the financial statements.
Can’t Answer ‘Why.’
|Year 1||Year 2||Year 3|
In the above table, we see that COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) for the company spiked in year three. Such a spike leads to a significant drop in gross profits. Such a drop could be due to the higher cost of production or from the drop in the price as well. Though the example shows an increase in the COGS, we can’t be sure unless management confirms it.
To make it clear, lets’ take a simple example. Suppose it takes $50 now to produce a product that sells for $100. In this case, COGS will be 50% of the sale price. Now, assume that the company reduces the cost of the product to $90, but the cost to produce it remains the same. The COGS to sale price will now be about 56%.
So, we can say that vertical analysis is a good tool to know what is happening in the financial statements. It also helps depict the changes say, the wealth created by the organization by looking at the value-added statement or a drop in the profits. But, it can’t really answer “Why.” Like, in the above example we know cost is a major reason for the drop in the profits. But, we can’t be sure if the costs have actually risen or the management has cut the prices of the product.
Thus, it will be best not to use vertical analysis as a tool to get an answer but use it to figure out what questions one may ask.